another one down. >>858516 @PonyerWojaker
Probably. But there'd have to be code made to do it, and it'd likely take some processing power that isn't quite available unless it's done on a standalone copy of the site/site's database. And considering the site's size, I doubt it'll be easy to do since you need enough drive space to hold the whole thing, while also
being on what's probably a shoestring budget.