Background Pony #5159
What's the difference between Ponerpics and Derpi, Twibooru, and Ponybooru?
Background Pony #547E
I heard this site was more based than Ponybooru. Are you more based, or are you just some more CIA Niggers?
Background Pony #00B1
@Background Pony #547E
You're not allowed to say nigger on this site, it's against the rules. I've reported you to the mods, expect to be banned shortly.
You're not allowed to say nigger on this site, it's against the rules. I've reported you to the mods, expect to be banned shortly.
Background Pony #CC0A
@Background Pony #547E
Terry Davis is dead, there's no one to protect you from them.
Terry Davis is dead, there's no one to protect you from them.
Lotus
Site Administrator
At PonyCon Holland, the Derpibooru admins announced the creation of a separate site for AI pony art, called “Tantabus”
Megalith
Site Moderator
@Wallbeige
for the amount they ban and delete shit they don't like.. 'grandfathering in' Aryanne art is peak retardation. if they got rid of it completely I'd go there honestly
for the amount they ban and delete shit they don't like.. 'grandfathering in' Aryanne art is peak retardation. if they got rid of it completely I'd go there honestly
Wallbeige 
Drangleic Inhabitant
"erm but akually.." yeah yeah we had this debate a million times, faggot
you can't fix stupid. and from each of our points of view it is the other
you can't fix stupid. and from each of our points of view it is the other
Megalith
Site Moderator
@Wallbeige
If it isn't equal, why would you need to move to a website where it is excluded? It should be no different than the MS Paint slop that gets posted.
Your art is independent of the quality and worth of other art, which is why you should not advocate for a site for poor art, a site for amateur art, a site for intermediate art, and a site for master artists. You want them together not only for ease of access, but to show the quality of your work, gain recognition for your talent, and help others achieve the same.
Your behavior shows that at some level, you do recognize AI art as equal to your own art, even if it isn't true, and view it not as MP Paint slop that should be filtered, but as real competition, even if you are unwilling to admit it. This is to the point that you will support the same basic premise of those that created the conditions to form this site from the tyranny that was ready to be unleashed. You only diverge from this mindset in political angle. Derpibooru wanted a site that removed elements that did not fit a cultural-Marxist worldview and would begin by removing new images featuring Aryanne and working against BLM, no doubt to expand as time went on to other targets. You want a site that removes AI art as it does not fit your worldview and will begin by removing all images that are AI. At least from your stance there is less chance for a snowball effect, but the result is similar: needless division that is solved by filtering.
Aryanne didn't affect the artwork of any user. AI does not affect your artwork. Your values are not impacted by the existence of things you don't like on the site. Now, spam is another matter. So far, images have been manageable, but I have no idea what is going to happen if they open floodgates with a new site, which is the greater concern. What sort of rate of import will there be if we import that? Will there be upload limits there as well? Will there be no incentive to upload AI art that looks decent with multiple generations and some photoshop? These concerns would be a better argument to make for anti-AI art instead of it being a few words generating an image. Again, we have artwork that consists of a couple of lines or a couple of copy/pasted images. Effort is irrelevant by precedent. Spam is relevant.
@Wallbeige
You aren't stupid. Just elitist. There is a difference. Try making some arguments instead of just insisting on superiority, because it is going to end up backfiring. After all, you made that clear. You will return to derpibooru, a place that you admitted would love to restrict art made by humans if it would only take away something you don't like in return. This is an elitist mindset where people can get fucked as long as you, either as an individual or as a group, are appeased. Luckily, there is a cure. Just realize that trash will be recognized by trash, things you don't like but aren't trash will be liked by some, and attracting those people that like those things to your art will only be a benefit.
If it isn't equal, why would you need to move to a website where it is excluded? It should be no different than the MS Paint slop that gets posted.
Your art is independent of the quality and worth of other art, which is why you should not advocate for a site for poor art, a site for amateur art, a site for intermediate art, and a site for master artists. You want them together not only for ease of access, but to show the quality of your work, gain recognition for your talent, and help others achieve the same.
Your behavior shows that at some level, you do recognize AI art as equal to your own art, even if it isn't true, and view it not as MP Paint slop that should be filtered, but as real competition, even if you are unwilling to admit it. This is to the point that you will support the same basic premise of those that created the conditions to form this site from the tyranny that was ready to be unleashed. You only diverge from this mindset in political angle. Derpibooru wanted a site that removed elements that did not fit a cultural-Marxist worldview and would begin by removing new images featuring Aryanne and working against BLM, no doubt to expand as time went on to other targets. You want a site that removes AI art as it does not fit your worldview and will begin by removing all images that are AI. At least from your stance there is less chance for a snowball effect, but the result is similar: needless division that is solved by filtering.
Aryanne didn't affect the artwork of any user. AI does not affect your artwork. Your values are not impacted by the existence of things you don't like on the site. Now, spam is another matter. So far, images have been manageable, but I have no idea what is going to happen if they open floodgates with a new site, which is the greater concern. What sort of rate of import will there be if we import that? Will there be upload limits there as well? Will there be no incentive to upload AI art that looks decent with multiple generations and some photoshop? These concerns would be a better argument to make for anti-AI art instead of it being a few words generating an image. Again, we have artwork that consists of a couple of lines or a couple of copy/pasted images. Effort is irrelevant by precedent. Spam is relevant.
@Wallbeige
You aren't stupid. Just elitist. There is a difference. Try making some arguments instead of just insisting on superiority, because it is going to end up backfiring. After all, you made that clear. You will return to derpibooru, a place that you admitted would love to restrict art made by humans if it would only take away something you don't like in return. This is an elitist mindset where people can get fucked as long as you, either as an individual or as a group, are appeased. Luckily, there is a cure. Just realize that trash will be recognized by trash, things you don't like but aren't trash will be liked by some, and attracting those people that like those things to your art will only be a benefit.