Feature suggestions and discussion

Forums » Site and Policy » Feature suggestions and discussion Search Posts
Started by Background Pony #4B2C
Posted
60 replies
Subscribe
mys_elf

Alright, here's another one that may or may not have an easy resolve: Can't seem to edit rating tag on >>2247934. Since this is the featureless edit I would think that it should be more questionable than explicit? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted Report
Background Pony #4D6C
@mys_elf
It’s not quite featureless imo. There’s some clear vulva on it, not to mention the minimal effort put into making the anus “featureless” by whiting out the middle of it. Some things would still be explicit even if no genitals are present, like censored porn, fingering through clothes, cum drinking, etc.
Posted Report
Background Pony #4D6C
@mys_elf
Crotchtits are just tits as far as ratings are concerned. If there was a pic of a topless woman smoking a cigarette on the beach, that wouldn’t be considered sexual, and therefore not tagged explicit.
Posted Report
mys_elf

@Background Pony #4D6C
I think most other featureless crotch edits get questionable or suggestive, but the main reason for my post was less about the actual rating and more about the site bug. Even beyond the rating tags every once in a while you'll get an image that'll give you troubles with tag editing.
Posted Report
Background Pony #2198
@mys_elf
That's a hard one. I wouldn't call it explicit, personally, but the finger pressing down implies a vulva to me. On the other hand, cameltoes can be much more blatant and they're questionable.
Sahroo

Egg
Would be nice if old comment editing would be enabled. Even Derpi decided that not allowing old comments to be edited was stupid
Syntax quick reference: *bold* _italic_ [spoiler]hide text[/spoiler] @[email protected] +underline+ -strike- ^sup^ ~sub~