For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Background Pony #9B49
Apparently the related images button is now broken. Not sure when exactly it happened, but it has to have been fairly recent. Pressing the button just redirects you to the home page now.
Posted Report
2023 Collab -

I suggest being notified as uploader, and perhaps as watcher, or separately as it's own setting, about tag changes, if possible.
Background Pony #3FEA
feet, being an anatomy tag, is innocuous overall and filtering it will catch a significant amount of artwork (for example, anything with a fullbody of oc:anon).
The tag you're thinking of is foot fetish, which is as bad as you imply.
Or hell, maybe he's a footfag and just prefers quality to slop.

Site Administrator

Why would you not already filter "feet"? What shows up on the 59948 "feet" tagged images that you want to see? And what on God's earth are you searching for such that Sunnyfeetfanreturn's 14 images come up in your search???
Background Pony #96FF
Ah yes, just to remove some literal autist's shitty edits (that don't even have anything to do with ponies) I have to also filter tons of things that are not said shitty edits. I'd ask you if you were daft, but you publicly admitted to having a liberal arts degree, so…

Site Administrator
@Background Pony #6508
As best as I can tell the images were deleted by the moderator because they were confused for being from a different, long-time spammer. I really don't care either way as it's like maybe 20 images and you'd have to basically intentionally look for these images to find them. I would have restored these weeks ago but I am both lazy and busy, and also the ongoing image posting campaign was funny.

tl;dr, filter it
Background Pony #6508
Should have just banned all low effort edited screen caps with impact font captions, random collages of ponys combined with other shit and ai-images and stuck to the policy of removing low effort content instead of removing one thing because you don't like it. All or nothing, and you choose to pussy out and do nothing in the end. Sad, really
Background Pony #96FF
IT IS always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
To call upon a neighbour and to say: –
"We invaded you last night – we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
And the people who ask it explain
That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
And then you'll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say: –
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray;
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
You will find it better policy to say: —

"We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that plays it is lost!"
Background Pony #55E8
Is there a way to report tags? There are some that only get used for spamming, for example:
instead of reporting images. Also, I was wondering, can admins/mods revert all changes made by select users?
Background Pony #3FF7
Well I wasn't demanding you add it right now, lol, it's just a suggestion for a feature I think would be useful. Also, what's up with the site anyway? I can't access the homepage, profiles, or any of the tag pages, but I seem to be able to use the rest of the site just fine (the forums, private messages, settings, filters, and specific image pages). I assume you already knew that though. Have you identified what's causing the issues yet? Is it to do with the server fetching search results or something? (i.e. recent uploads, tag searches, etc.)

Site Moderator
@Background Pony #3FF7
I don't believe this is a feature nor do I predict this getting added anytime soon as the changes we are attempting have been breaking the site. While we troubleshoot this, I suggest making two different filter settings and swapping between your filter that blocks AI and one that allows it and search AI when you are curious to browse the selection.
Background Pony #3FF7
Would it be (or is it already) possible to "spoiler" certain tags without having them hidden behind a spoiler image?
I currently have AI Content spoilered, not because I don't want to see it but because I like to know in advance if an image is AI before I click on it. However, it'd be nice to be able to see the images without having to reveal them first, I just want the banner across the top of the thumbnail saying that it's AI Content.
Showing results 1 - 25 of 127 total

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190