Posts

Site is returning "Internal Server Error" for any page listing images.

Another post about reports:
I've been uploading a lot of images today, some of which are higher quality versions of older uploads. I've put in all the necessary reports but would just like to make a note that some of the images will be the same resolution as the older uploads. The difference is these newer uploads do not have a watermark across them, so they should be the superior version. I mention this because the difference between them may not be obvious if just looking at the thumbnails and the file stats. Probably should have made mention in the reports themselves, but I didn't think of it at the time. Basically would like to try and prevent having to track down images merged the wrong way.

Seems a good a place as any to post:
I reported >>6341928 with the target/source swapped. The newer upload should be merged into the older.

Would it be possible to add very basic tags that are automatically added upon uploading, by file detection? For example, "webm" or "video" upon uploading a .webm, "absurd resolution" whenever a picture is 4000x4000, ect.?

There’s still a 3-report limit and a message that says the limit is 5. One of those needs to be changed.

@Background Pony #5BDC
don't use discord if you don't want your private messaging data to be sold. Or at least use caution when messaging to your friends. Discretion is a bliss these days.

@Background Pony #5BDC
I think we've just isolated the cause of that problem. Let's see if we can implement the solution

When posting to sites like discord, the link imbed is still showing Derpibooru. Image link

@2Merr

Oh, my bad. Thanks for pointing that out!

So glad someone isn't out there rage tagging stuff with "needs more jpeg" that would be so stupid.

@skybrook
Read one post above yours. Twibooru tagged the file type (jpeg), and the porter bot brought that tag over. Unfortunately the “needs more jpeg” tag is applied here because “jpeg” is aliased to it. The problem would be solved with un-aliasing.

@skybrook
You can do that here. I hated the lesbian tag being attached to lyra and bon-bon since it wasn't implied so I removed it.

Personally I'd like to strip "needs more jpeg" from sites that tag all an artist's images with "needs more jpeg" whether it has any jpeg artifacts or not.

Like seriously, are they doing that out of a hate boner, or am I just blind?

@porter
@Boxless
Also un-aliasing “jpeg” from “needs more jpeg”, since Twibooru auto-tags file types

@porter
Seconding this, if you're importing from Twibooru in some fashion.

Any chance of aliasing "unofficial characters only" to "oc only"?

@Background Pony #6C93
the poni has rings. It is qualified as "edit". Not dublicate

I am currently on hiatus with study. I am about to be expelled from university so I have no time to spare. Just a few minutes to browse for ponerpics porn, no more.

I have no time to check for dublicates. though I did report some recent arts.

@Soft Lava
You can find her artworks to check the marked duplicates.

Also, you didn't marked duplicate from my first message

@Background Pony #6C93
I dunno. Sometimes I just forget to do thhat

@Soft Lava
I don't want to log in :<. I'm just see what's the improvement of this site.

Also, Why you didn't report when you see duplicate images? Most of the duplicated images are from artist:melisareb

Cannot post image. I get a 413 request entity too large when I try.
Image:
https://u.smutty.horse/ltdtfjepwnf.png
Tags:
oc:nasapone, ponut, anatomically correct, zipper, clothes, anal only, explicit, anoncolt, dock, tail raised, dialog, imminent sex, imminent anal, looking back at you, magic, pony, unicorn, earth pony, sweat, blushing, plot, mouth open

@Background Pony #9EDF
Click on a "report" button below the source of the pic then click on "updating/merging". this should do the trick.

Can you merge this >>6068682 into this >>6070544
The artist removed the first version.

Would be nice if old comment editing would be enabled. Even Derpi decided that not allowing old comments to be edited was stupid

@mys_elf
That's a hard one. I wouldn't call it explicit, personally, but the finger pressing down implies a vulva to me. On the other hand, cameltoes can be much more blatant and they're questionable.

@Background Pony #4D6C
I think most other featureless crotch edits get questionable or suggestive, but the main reason for my post was less about the actual rating and more about the site bug. Even beyond the rating tags every once in a while you'll get an image that'll give you troubles with tag editing.